BobY777
09-03-2007, 09:58 PM
Let's say I have the following setup, whereby a customer (who wants a public static IP) is connected to my main router.
Internet > main router (with 1:1 NATing) > bridged wireless system > customer router (NATed with private static IP on wan) > switch > rest of network
Just think of the bridged wireless system, as a long ethernet cable.
I understand that with 1:1 NATing, the customer would have a private static IP address on the WAN port of his router…and I would have to configure a public static IP in the 1:1 NATing section of the main router.
Wouldn’t this 1:1 NATing allow the customer to remote into his network, the same as if the main router was in bridge mode and the customer had the public static IP address on the WAN port of his router?
But, I have heard that some applications on the customer’s computer (that he might try to access remotely…maybe via VPN), may not work properly, unless the WAN port of the customer’s router actually had a public static IP address. I’m not sure how true that is.
So I could use some comments on this.
I would think that 1:1 NATing would even have some advantages, such as the inherent security of NAT.
Thanks for any comments on this.
Internet > main router (with 1:1 NATing) > bridged wireless system > customer router (NATed with private static IP on wan) > switch > rest of network
Just think of the bridged wireless system, as a long ethernet cable.
I understand that with 1:1 NATing, the customer would have a private static IP address on the WAN port of his router…and I would have to configure a public static IP in the 1:1 NATing section of the main router.
Wouldn’t this 1:1 NATing allow the customer to remote into his network, the same as if the main router was in bridge mode and the customer had the public static IP address on the WAN port of his router?
But, I have heard that some applications on the customer’s computer (that he might try to access remotely…maybe via VPN), may not work properly, unless the WAN port of the customer’s router actually had a public static IP address. I’m not sure how true that is.
So I could use some comments on this.
I would think that 1:1 NATing would even have some advantages, such as the inherent security of NAT.
Thanks for any comments on this.