Wildcats
08-29-2003, 10:49 AM
I need to chose to implement either Open or Shared-Key authentication our our access points. Granted, I should use something else (EAP?), but I have no choice in this case.
Open auth is subject to DoS attacks, since the AP could be overloaded with "associations".
Shared-key auth suffers from sending both plain-text AND cipher text during the authetication process. Someone with enough time and CPU power could use these two pieces of info to obtain the WEP key. We may be talking NSA's capabilities in this case, not simply a person using WEPCrack! WEPCrack exploits a different weakness.......
I like the idea of shared-key auth, since it will allow me to see authentication failures in my logs (from people that have no WEP key or the incorrect WEP key). I can then track them down (?). However, there is an outside chance that the WEP key(s) could be compromised, as it appears that no encrpytion algorithm is perfect.
Your thoughts?
Open auth is subject to DoS attacks, since the AP could be overloaded with "associations".
Shared-key auth suffers from sending both plain-text AND cipher text during the authetication process. Someone with enough time and CPU power could use these two pieces of info to obtain the WEP key. We may be talking NSA's capabilities in this case, not simply a person using WEPCrack! WEPCrack exploits a different weakness.......
I like the idea of shared-key auth, since it will allow me to see authentication failures in my logs (from people that have no WEP key or the incorrect WEP key). I can then track them down (?). However, there is an outside chance that the WEP key(s) could be compromised, as it appears that no encrpytion algorithm is perfect.
Your thoughts?